1. On March 30, 2015, around 20:47, at the front of a bus stop located adjacent to the exit of 7 U.S. dollars located in the training course of the Suwon-gu Busan.

1. Basic facts

A. Around March 30, 2015, B, the driver of the city bus No. CD (hereinafter “instant bus”) owned by the Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) started with the bus front after the passenger was loaded at the port of the bus stop located adjacent to the port located adjacent to the Busan Young-gu training on March 30, 2015.

B. Meanwhile, the Defendant was waiting for the bus at the bus stops, but it was confirmed that the bus of this case entered the bus stops, but did not board the bus of this case which stopped.

B: A.

As described in the port, it confirmed that there was no passenger who wants to board the bus no longer than after boarding the passenger, and the defendant, who became aware that the bus in this case was a D No. which he was waiting, found at the latest, to be a seat of the right side of the bus in this case departing from the bus stop to the roadway.

In the process, the defendant became the center of the defendant, and immediately after that, the back wheels of the bus of this case served on the left side of the defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Defendant, due to the instant accident, sustained damage from the pressure of the parts of the satisfaction, from the string, from the strings of the strings of the lower side, from the strings of the strings of the strings of the structural frame, and from other serious water

The plaintiff is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract with the passenger of the passenger of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including virtual number), Gap evidence 5 video, purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The accident of this case occurred due to the defendant's unilateral negligence that occurred in excess of getting off the bus of this case already launched at the bus stops and putting it up on the roadway, and there is no negligence on the bus driver of this case. 2) The defendant's argument that the bus driver of this case is the bus driver of this case at the bus stops.