1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff

A. Defendant B is the Suwon District Court’s Suwon District Court’s registry office on January 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on September 20, 1973 with respect to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 and paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 with respect to each real estate listed in the attached Table No. 3 and paragraph (4) with respect to each real estate listed in the attached Table No. 3 and paragraph (4) with respect to each real estate.

(hereinafter, each real estate listed in the separate sheet is referred to as “instant real estate”). B.

(1) E used the fact that the Plaintiff’s resident registration number was not indicated in the Plaintiff’s column on the registry of the instant real estate, and conspired with F, G, etc. to arbitrarily dispose of the instant real estate by pretending to be the owner of the instant real estate as if it were the Plaintiff.

(2) On November 12, 2014, E entered the name of the Plaintiff and A, and subsequently, he/she resided in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H at the owner’s domicile on the registry of the instant real estate, and was committed as if he/she was the owner of the instant real estate using a forged resident registration abstract, and sold it to Defendant B on December 18, 2014.

(3) After January 30, 2015, E, etc. had a certified judicial scrivener I completed the ownership transfer registration with the Defendant B at the Suwon District Court Port Office, and on the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 18, 2014 under the name of Defendant B (hereinafter “instant ownership transfer”).

C. On January 30, 2015, Defendant B issued the registration of establishment of a neighboring mortgage and the establishment of a superficies to Defendant C and the Selection Party D on each of the instant real estate on January 30, 2015.

E, etc. are as follows.

In the case of public electronic records, such as the entry in the port, it was charged with the charge of the false entry in the public electronic records, and the charge of the exercise of false entry in the public electronic records.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 9 (including partial numbers), and the fact-finding results of the red 1 head of this court's red 1 head, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The above facts of recognition are examined as follows.