logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.05.11 2018고단437
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

D. The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B. B: (a) foreigners of the Republic of Korea of business B/C have opened an office to vicariously file an application for his/her stay in the Republic of Korea with the name of “H” in the Nam-gu G Office 332, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, the Republic of Korea: (b) from them to prepare documents, etc., translation of the relevant documents, or consultation and advice related thereto; and (c) Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea around April 8, 2017 with the visa exemption (B-1, period of stay one month); and (d) on May 19, 2017, Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea, taking into account the nationality of the Republic of Korea, and entered the Republic of Korea as “H” (hereinafter referred to as “I”), Defendant D’s spouse living in the Republic of Korea with the permission to change his/her sojourn period (F-1, year 1, 1, 2017).

1. On April 2017, Defendant B, who committed the public offering of Defendant B, C, and D, was requested by Defendant B to have his husband (hereinafter referred to as “A”) visit the above Party B (hereinafter referred to as “A”) to change the status of stay for the purpose of visiting the said Party B (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and prepared documents necessary for the application, and it is impossible for Defendant B and I to seek a lease agreement to be attached to the above application because it did not reach the point of entry into the Republic of Korea. Defendant B instructed Defendant C to seek a lease agreement as if A and I were living together. Defendant C knew of the name of Defendant B and I, and requested Defendant C to request Defendant D to seek a false lease agreement, and Defendant D conspired to exercise the right to use the lease agreement by forging it. Defendant D conspired to this.

A. According to the forgery of private documents, Defendant D knows the trade name at Asan CityJ around April 16, 2017.

arrow