Seoul Administrative Court 2009Guhap36309 ( October 11, 2010)

Effects of changes in real rights over immovables made in violation of the Real Estate Real Name Act.

Even if a union's act of transfer of ownership in the name of its member without registration of combination is invalid in violation of the Real Estate Real Name Act, not only a person who acquires a real right, such as ownership or mortgage, based on the above registration, but also a third party such as a person who has the right of seizure or provisional seizure, etc.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Man Doz 300

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

제1심 판결을 취소한다, 원고에 대하여, (1) 피고 ■■세무서장이 2002. 8. 17. 별지 목록 1 기재 부동산에 관하여 한 압류처분, 2008. 10. 6. 별지 목록 2 기재 부동산에 관하여 한 압류처분, 2007. 10. 12. 별지 목록 3의 가 기재 부동산 중 원고 소유 지분에 관하여 한 압류처분, 2009. 6. 12. 별지 목록 3의 나 기재 부동산 중 원고 소유 지분에 관하여 한 압류처분은 각 무효임을 확인한다, (2) 피고 대한민국은 별지 목록 1 기재 부동산에 관하여 ◇◇◇◇지방법원 ■■등기소 2002. 8. 20. 접수 제89666호로 경료된 압류등기의, 별지 목록 2 기재 부동산에 관하여 ○○○○지방법원 성북등기소 2008. 10. 8. 접수 제58112호로 경료된 압류등기의, 별지 목록 3의 가 기재 부동산 지분에 관하여 △△지방법원 등기국 2007. 10. 15. 접수 제181160호로 경료된 압류등기의, 별지 목록 3의 나 기재 부동산 지분에 관하여 △△지방법원 등기국 2009. 6. 16. 접수 제 114402호로 경료된 압류등기의 각 말소등기절차를 이행하라.

쇠鹬 쇠鹬 3000 쇠鹬 3000

1. Acceptance of a judgment of the court of first instance;

The reasons why a member should explain this case are the same as the reasons in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition of the statements in subparagraphs 5-1 and 2 of Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the application of Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it is, in the case where it is insufficient to recognize that the registration of ownership transfer of regular A was made without any cause under the above Article of the documents related

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.