1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the first instance judgment, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, ① “E” in the second part 8, ② “K” in the third part 21, ③ “K” in the fourth part 6, and ③ “E” in the fourth part 6, even if the representative director D of the Defendant, other than H, comprehensively delegated his authority as his representative director, and G was substantially controlled by the Defendant, a juristic act done under the name of the Defendant is null and void as an unauthorized Representation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da14005, Aug. 20, 196); “Ro, 4. 13” and “B” respectively.

B. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “10” is added later than “No. 4” of the first instance judgment.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.