logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.19 2016나13978
퇴직금 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the judgment of the first instance, among the questions, ① “the Labor Period Division Act” in the 3th and 4th parallels in the 3rd and fourth parallels in the Labor Standards Act shall be deemed to be “the Labor Standards Act”, ② the 4th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 7th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 7th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 4th parallels in the 7th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 19th parallels in the 19th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 19th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 6th parallels in the 7th parallels in the 31,772,967 won”, respectively.

B. Of the text of the judgment of the first instance, ① “wages interest rate” shall be added to “from August 20, 2015” in the first instance judgment, and ② “the deduction” shall be added to “the gold source” in the first instance judgment, and “the gold source” in the first instance judgment, respectively.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow