1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Acknowledgement of and amendment to the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the judgment of the first instance court from 6th to 7th part of the second part of the judgment of the second instance "(hereinafter referred to as "the second part of the judgment in this case") was "the injury suffered from the second part of the judgment in this case")."

Part 20 of the judgment of the first instance court in the second 20th 20th 20th , "the case was damaged," and "the case was damaged by the public."

The second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second second of the court's decision is "the second second second second second second second second second second second second of the judgment".

The part concerning “the instant difference” in the third 6th 6th 6th 6th and 10th 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 10th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 6th 6th 6th

From 10th to 11th 9th 14th 10th 10th 10th 10th 11th 9th 10th 206.

A medical opinion was presented to the effect that there was a chronic rupture view after reviewing the data on the video of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement held on August 30, 2002, which was held on April 2016. However, this only appears to mean that “the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture,” or that “the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of August 30, 2002,” or that “the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the rupture of the plaintiff appears to be a medical opinion.