A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, an Internet portal site, “Kakao Co., Ltd. (Damu)” (hereinafter “victim”), is an open Internet blost, an open Internet blosting service provider, and Trosting service (hereinafter “victim”) is a company that provides Trost services, a victim C (V, 27 years old), and a victim D (32 years old) is an employee of the Customer Center of the Victim Company.

1. On October 1, 2013, at the Defendant’s residence located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 202, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) using the NAV Adidi, Twitter account “G”, “H” on the NAV block; and (b) using the NAV block; (c) by taking away one Saturday from one another’s p.m.; and (d) using the NAV Bluter account; and (d) using the NAV, the NAV has changed several times in number; and (e) a NAV has written a letter on the NAV.

As long as compliance connected to the following Titto and mobile cannot be known to the mobile, it is necessary to take a phenomenon and be placed within a year.

I will cut off access to the Internet of Saturdays and suspend the key and make it unusable.

The words “I” shall be written on the NAVER.

Dried cryer crypine

In addition, from July 30, 2017 to July 30, 2017, she published the false information that “I shall make an unfeasible and unfasible war, I shall spread 2,703 false information on the part of the victim company’s customer reception, as shown in attached Table 1, 2, as in the list of crimes, on a total of 8 times in NAV block, and on a total of 2,703 occasions in Twitter, and from July 13, 2015 to May 25, 2017, she interfered with the victim company’s customer reception business by telephone to the customer center of the victim company at a total of 478 times, such as the list of crimes, fraudulent means, and force.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the customer response service of the victim company by spreading false information.

2. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

A. The Defendant against the victim C on January 11, 2016.