beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Both the Defendant and the Victim B are the believers of “C church”, and the above “C church” has committed a crime under the so-called “C church” and D pastors supporting D pastors.
In response to the argument, it is a dispute that is divided into the so-called "duplicative strike" that supports the reform of a church, and the victim uses the "E" and operates the "F" to the Internet website, and prepares a letter that supports the reform of the "C church" on the above Bloet, and the defendant uses the "G" and operates the "H" to the Internet website and prepares a letter that supports the "H".
1. Defluence;
A. On September 5, 2017, the Defendant insultd on September 5, 2017, at the Defendant’s home located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, referred the victim to the title “J” operated by the Defendant, and “I would like to think if I would like to have had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had.
The same person shall be deemed to have no brain;
I think I think Doz.
(b) Giving a public notice stating "(a)" to the victim publicly insulting the victim.
B. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant’s insultd on September 27, 2017 refers to the complainant’s title, “K,” which is operated by the Defendant at the seat of the above Defendant’s office, as the title “K,” and it is doubtful as to whether this part of the Defendant’s house complies with it.
Along with the pet’s Maternity, she publicly insultingd the victim by posting a letter “I ambling with a lot of psychological knife.”
2. Around September 12, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) in the name of “L” in the title of “L” on the NAV block Brog operated by the Defendant’s house at the above Defendant’s house. In addition, the case of the withdrawal of the case was flick, not the case of creating a sound that is inside the horses, and the case of the case where the Defendant flicked the mixed foreign capital so far.E. Non-E.