logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.21 2014고단6440
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 3, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Customs Act at the Busan District Court on August 11, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 11, 201.

[Criminal facts] 2014 Highest 6440

1. H is a U.S. national representative director of I who primarily engages in the wholesale and retail business of agricultural and fishery products, and Defendant A is a person who imports and sells dry fish products using the name of H when receiving a certain fee from H.

As of June 201, 1, 201, Korea Bank has a debt of KRW 550 million worth of KRW 50 million. around January 201, 1, 201, the Defendant and H have a loan of KRW 400 million from the Saemaul Treasury in the form of a loan by taking the custody of a good by taking the custody of a good by taking out from K, which was operated by J Company B, and around June 201, the Defendant and H had the above K offered a good by taking out the destroyed goods as security and received KRW 290,126 million from the Korea Saemaul Bank. At the time, the Defendant did not have any property through personal rehabilitation, and the Defendant and H did not intend to obtain the loan by taking out the loan or selling the money as security, and did not intend to obtain the loan or selling the money by taking out the loan or selling it as security, even if they did not intend to do so by normal means.

On June 22, 2011, the Defendant called the victim on the phone, and called “I would pay the price in full within 10 days from the 10th day of the week by supplying the 600 scambling at first due to a sudden situation,” and the Defendant issued 600 scamblings equivalent to KRW 21 billion at the market price of the same day from the victim (335,000,000 at the 1st day of the 201st day). On June 23, 2011, the Defendant called “I will pay the victim additional 150 scambling at the 600 scambling day before the 150 scambling day of the 150 scambling.”

arrow