Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 2010, the Defendant stated that “If the Defendant supplied approximately KRW 59,960,000 to the Defendant, such as yellow bonds, etc., to the Defendant, at the E office operated by the Victim D(47 years of age) located in Gangnam-si, the Defendant would make payment within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the supply of the goods by selling it, and then, the Defendant would transfer the FF land nine times as security, and the Defendant would transfer the right to collateral to the FF land at the time of Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant received the delivery of the dried goods, such as yellow bonds worth KRW 59,960,000 on the same day from the victim who believed it.

However, in fact, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price within 30 days, even if he sells the dryer that was received from the victim due to taxes in arrears, G and H’s obligations owed to individuals, and obligations owed to the issuance of bills, etc., and the right to collateral security offered as security by the victim was no value of collateral due to senior provisional seizure.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, obtained a fry, such as 59,960,000 won or more, and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written agreement for trading goods, or a certified copy of register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Evidence Records 119, 127, 140 pages);

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act (Fraud and Selection of Fine);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order include: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; and (b) the number of damages in the instant case and the victim not wanted to be punished. It is so decided as per Disposition for the foregoing reasons.