Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in agriculture, and Defendant B is a person engaged in electrical construction business.

Defendant

A around March 2014, while raising Han 157 mari in a livestock shed in Busan Metropolitan City and engaging in the livestock industry, it was difficult for the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs to continue the business due to the Free Trade Agreement (FTA), and applied for direct compensation for damages and losses paid to farmers who discontinue the business with the fund of the Agricultural and Livestock Industry Free Trade Agreement fund, but the public officials in charge did not dispose of 90 mari out of the 157 man among the 90 man which were raised by the livestock shed in Busan Metropolitan City by November 2014.

Defendant

A On November 2014, 2014, the first police officer asked Defendant B, who had an empty livestock shed in Gyeongsan-si D, to transfer 90,000 won a monthly rent of KRW 300,00 to Defendant B so that the livestock shed may be pretended to be purchased and sold, while raising 90,000 won a monthly rent of KRW 30,00,000, and Defendant B consented.

Accordingly, on November 2014, Defendant A transferred 90 mari, which was raised by livestock pens located in Sinsan City, to livestock pens of Defendant D in Sinsan-si, and the name of the owner of Korean Mari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fari-fab

Meanwhile, around November 13, 2014, Defendant A paid KRW 50 million in cash to Defendant B in order to pretend that the purchase price was actually paid, and Defendant B deposited this into his own account and transferred it to Defendant A’s account.

Defendant

A In order to verify the closure of a Haman on November 2014, 2014, it means all the disposals of the Handob, which was raised to F, etc. by the staff members of the Myeon Office E-Myeon Office of Gyeongsan, which was found to be a stable in Gyeongsan City, and it was confirmed that the business was closed.

Defendant

A For the purpose of pretending that the purchase price was actually paid on or around December 2, 2014, Defendant B.