The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding 1) The Defendant, 2016, 307, 2016, 307, attempted to put the victim’s wheelchairs, and the victim was carrying a stick that happens on his own and did not assault the victim.

2) Criminal facts of 2016 High Court 308 High Court 2016 Ga) 1, the Defendant did not drink and did not interfere with the victim’s work.

B) The criminal facts of Paragraph 2 do not interfere with the victim's business even though the defendant want to take the SK Telecom Busan branch office only, but did not go through the victim, and did not interfere with the victim's business.

C) The Defendant ordered gambling disease at the victim’s pharmacy, and the victim merely resisted the Defendant as murderer and did not interfere with his/her business.

D) Although the defendant was removed from a signboard attached to the wall of the crime of paragraph 4, the defendant does not interfere with the victim's business.

E) Although the Defendant had changed CCTV to a worker, etc. to find a lost room in the P Station’s subway service room, the Defendant did not appear to show, but did not interfere with the work.

3) Although the Defendant received a report on the loss from the victim and asked the victim to recover the lost room, the Defendant did not insult the victim.

4) The Defendant at 2016, 2016, 310, did not receive a request from the victim H to return a mobile phone left to charge the victim H, and did not interfere with his/her business, and there was no insult against the police officer dispatched.

5) The Defendant of this case 2016 and 311 had not pushed the victim W’s chest.

6) The Defendant of the 2016 High 313 Incident brought about the use of a mobile phone with the consent of the victim Y, so there was no intention of illegal acquisition.

7) The Defendant, 2016, fixed 417, was the victim with a stick in his possession.