Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Changwon District Court Decision 225, Masan Branch Court Decision 2016, 505, 505, and 505, 2016, 2016, 505, and 201, 17, 17, 17, 17, 200, 200, 7,000,000.

The Defendant “F and E had been pushed down with each other’s head debt from his defense counsel.”

In the light of the question of “Written Statement”, it is not deemed that “I am saw only if I am in the last satch, I am am sather, and I am am sather am satch.”

The testimony was made.

However, on August 30, 2016, the Defendant observed that F and E were able to catch their hairs and tightly and closely.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Changwon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 505 High Court Decision 201

1. Each protocol of examination of witness against the E of the Changwon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 505 High Court Decision and the defendant;

1. Copy of the statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant, upon the lapse of time, only testified as the memory was observed, and did not prove any perjury.

2. The judgment of this court can be recognized based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated as follows: ① on August 30, 2016, F was shaking the head debt of E-do E-do, scambling the head debt, and subsequently, F was scaming the face part of E with the appearance on board the ship by cutting the E in excess of E on the floor; ② The Defendant was in dispute with F and E at the police on September 30, 2016 with a large volume of f and E, and was scamed with each other and was scamed with their head debt, and scamed with them, and scam small E.