logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.11.27 2015가합62589
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

C A. On October 7, 201, while performing work at a factory on October 7, 201, he/she suffered industrial accidents, such as leaving a distance from 4 meters high, leaving the right door to the right, etc., and was performed at a hospital on the same day.

C On February 15, 2012, at an E Hospital operated by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), it was diagnosed that it is necessary to conduct re-operation due to the non-conformity of the foregoing surgery (internal re-operation, emulsion, emulsion and emulation, and emulation).

On March 6, 2012, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital could not immediately proceed with the operation because of the high numerical value of C, and the medical personnel of the defendant hospital decided to perform the operation when the future numerical value is recovered.

C From March 13, 2012, from around 14:15, 2012, Defendant A, a doctor affiliated with the Defendant hospital, had undergone an operation (hereinafter “instant operation”), and the said operation was completed at around 19:30 on the same day.

Around 20:08 on the same day, when the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital shouldered C at a general anesthesia, C did not return to food as the beer was rapidly lowered, and the beer was recovered due to first aid, but the food was not recovered. As such, the Defendant Hospital transferred C to F Hospital around 01:38 on March 14, 2012.

C has failed to recover consciousness until now due to low carbon brain damage, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "in this case's bad result").

【In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the branch numbers), and the result of the commission of the examination of medical records to the G Hospital head of this court, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital asserted the purport of the entire pleadings committed the following errors in the course of the instant surgery, thereby causing adverse consequences in the instant case.

① In other words, despite the occurrence of excessive blood transfusion during the instant surgery, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital failed to take the response measures.

② Although there was a disease between C and the anesthesia of the Defendant hospital prior to the instant surgery, the medical professionals at the Defendant hospital conducted a general anesthesia and performed the instant surgery.

C.

arrow