A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court on July 24, 2016, the date of the instant crime is recognized as July 24, 2016. Since it is obvious that July 23, 2016 stated in the indictment is a clerical error, the Defendant is corrected as above.

around 01:00, by means of copying the front and rear sides of the 10,000 won west (FE0953561F) issued by the Bank of Korea using a local printer for the purpose of exercising at the defendant's house located in Incheon Si-si, Incheon, and copying 12 copies of the 10,000 won west (JL1916235J: JL 1916235J) 3, 15730842), 3, 10,000 won End (JD15730842), 2, 12, in total.

2. As seen in paragraph (1) of July 24, 2016, the Defendant in a forged currency event is obvious that July 23, 2016 stated in the indictment is a clerical error. As such, the Defendant’s correction is made as above.

At around 05:23, at “G” destination establishments operated by F in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, F, who may know of the fact, exercised the forged 12 Chapter 12,00 won Dozine, as the price for marina land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (in cases of attaching photographs of site sites for search, seizure, and verification inside the suspect's residence) and data attached thereto;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 207(1) of the Criminal Act (with regard to the provision of the currency Articles, inclusive, the choice of limited imprisonment) concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 207(4) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising counterfeited currency and the choice of limited imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment determined for a crime of uttering of counterfeited currency heavier than the hostage)

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act