logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.26 2018고단3041
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Madern 3041] The Defendant: (a) conspired with the victims to receive money from the victims; (b) pretended to the investigation agency, such as the prosecutor, investigator, etc. by posting a phone call to an unspecified number of unspecified persons; and (c) deceptioned the victims by “after confirmation to the Financial Supervisory Service, after withdrawing cash from the investigation because the victim’s name was stolen; and (d) suggested forged documents, etc. under the name of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, as if the victims were the employees of the Financial Supervisory Commission; (b) made it possible for the victims to do so; (c) received cash from the victims; and (d) took part in the role of remitting the remainder of damage excluding one’s money, to the account designated by the victims.

On April 30, 2018, in accordance with the above public invitation, the person whose name was omitted was "the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office, which was a public prosecutor of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, was used as the head of the Tong."

All of the money in the account was withdrawn and delivered to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service by us, that the money sent through the Financial Supervisory Service would be returned by confirming whether the money sent is a legitimate money and the one-time display number.

However, there was no prosecutor, and there was no intention to return money even if he received money from the injured party as above.

On April 30, 2018, the Defendant received instructions from the wounded in name, and around 15:43 around 15:43 on April 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) performed as if the victim was an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service; and (b) received KRW 1,346,00 from the injured party before the exit of 1,3.460,000.

Accordingly, the defendant obtained money from the victim in collusion with the name in order to obtain money from the victim.

[2018 Highest 3272] The defendant is willing to acquire money from victims in collusion with the victims of telephone financing fraud officers, etc. in order.

arrow