1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On December 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, at around 12:10, 2015, was on board the ebbbbbbal East-dong, Incheon East-dong, while boarding the eb.g., 12:27.

After the electric trains arrive at the same du river basin, they approach the entrance to get out of the electric dynamics to get out of the electric dynamics, the Plaintiff's knick knick was set between the entrances at the wind where the entrance of the electric dynamics is shut down automatically.

After confirming the completion of passengers' getting off, the former crew of the Defendant, who operated the entrance, the opening and closing location of the entrance, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer losses due to the negligence in violation of the duty of care to prevent accidents, such as placing the passengers on the entrance, even though he/she had a duty of care to prevent such accidents.

The plaintiff's son's son's son's son's son's son still remains symptoms, and this is suffering from mental pain.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

2. We examine whether an accident, as alleged by the Plaintiff, occurred.

First, according to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff has a knife and chroe symptoms, and that the above symptoms were shocked with the front door of the Dong-dong on December 23, 2015. However, the part of the opinion on the above knife of the above knife depends solely on the plaintiff's statement that is the patient, and the above knife of the above knife is difficult to believe the circumstances of the occurrence of the accident described in the above opinion, unless there is any other evidence supporting the plaintiff's claim in the instant case where the above knife is the issue.

Other evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s above assertion as to the background of the occurrence of the accident, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

Rather, in full view of the witness B's testimony and the whole purport of pleading.