The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, as the vice head of the former and the latter, is obligated to verify the safety of passengers getting on and off the crew’s work, and due to the nature of the history of the instant case, which is the valley platform, the Defendant has the duty of care to check whether the passengers get on and off the land and to carefully observe the CCTV monitoring in close vicinity to the latter.

However, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts, since the defendant did not go through the additional verification process, and did not discover the victim who appears in the CCTV screen immediately before the start of the electric vehicle and caused the driver to start the electric vehicle, and therefore, the court below acquitted the defendant.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the person in charge of the opening and closing of the entrance of the electric trains and passenger getting off and off the passenger while serving as the subway 4 electric trains and the vice head of the electric trains belonging to the Seoul Metro Corporation.

On January 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 13:49, the subway No. 4 in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the subway No. 13:49, and (b) the Victim E (n. 69 years old) had the victim used her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband. In this case, the Defendant got off from the front line of the front line of the front line that the Defendant served as the Vice Minister. In such a case, the Vice Minister, after examining whether the passengers’ her hand, light, belongings, and belongings had all passengers safely left the front line, confirmed that the passengers had all the passengers safely left the entrance and sent the entrance to the engineer company in violation of his her her responsibilities, without discovering any discovery that the victim was leaving the entrance and caused the victim to leave the entrance and caused the victim to take off the entrance at around 10 meters from his her occupational negligence, and caused the victim to take off the entrance.