logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.12 2014구단1113
재요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s first medical care, etc. (1) around 16:00 on April 24, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) around 16:0, at the workplace of the C company located in Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, the arrangement of the workplace and the tool for the use of the tool for the use of the rashing work; and (b) caused oil to be cut off on the floor and left hand over the floor (hereinafter “instant disaster”).

) Injury or disease of “in the instant injury or disease” (hereinafter referred to as the “existing injury or disease of this case”) of “in the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the ground garr, ververververging in the upper part of the ground

(2) The Plaintiff suffered losses. (2) The Plaintiff was approved by the Defendant as an industrial accident and received treatment for the instant injury and disease from D Council members, etc. from April 25, 2013 to August 17, 2013, and was judged as class 12 subparagraph 9 of the disability grade.

B. On October 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care and the Defendant’s non-approval disposition of additional medical care on the ground that the previous injury or disease in the instant case due to the instant disaster occurred or aggravated, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care (hereinafter “instant injury or injury”). However, on October 30, 2013, the Defendant received additional medical care and non-approval disposition of additional medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the above existing injury and disease of this case is aggravated after the treatment of the existing injury and disease of this case occurred due to the disaster of this case, and active treatment of the injury and disease of this case is required. Thus, additional medical care should be approved.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case which rejected the plaintiff's application for additional medical care should be revoked.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

(c) Determination 1 additional medical care.

arrow