1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff on December 22, 2014 is revoked.

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 16, 2010, the Plaintiff, while working in Dongin Safety (ju), was involved in a crashing of a light light on the corridor located in the Dom in the Dom in the Dom of the Nonghyup Education Center (hereinafter “the instant disaster”). On September 16, 2010, the Plaintiff was involved in a crashing of the Dombridge on the Dom in the Dom. (hereinafter “the instant disaster”).

B. In the instant case, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury or disease (hereinafter “approval injury or disease”) of the “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise sate sate sate satum, satum sate satume satum, tensionsatum satum, and left-hand satum sate sate sate satum,” and completed all first medical care and additional medical care around February 28, 2014 with the Defendant’s approval from the occupational accident, and received the determination of disability grade

C. After that, on December 12, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and additional medical care with the Defendant on the grounds that “the instant injury and disease occurred after the credit was caused” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”), but the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on December 22, 2014 on the ground that “the instant injury and disease does not meet the requirements for additional injury and medical care.”

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3, Eul 1, 3, and 5 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion falls under the requirements for additional medical care due to the recurrence or aggravation of symptoms of the existing approved injury or disease, or under the requirements for additional additional medical care due to the cause of the instant accident or approved injury and disease, and thus, the Defendant’s disposition that all of them approved was unlawful.

(b) The definitions of terms used in this Act shall be as follows: