beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff suffered from the occupational accident that occurred on May 26, 192 (hereinafter “the instant accident”) the difference of “the field sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, sponse, light signboard escape certificate (No. 3-4, 5-6, and 6-7), sponse sponse, and sponse (temporary occurrence after the operation),” and received medical treatment from the Defendant from May 26, 1992 to October 31, 201.
B. On May 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a request for medical care benefits again against the Defendant, “HHY No. 6-7” (hereinafter “the instant additional medical care”) and for additional injury and disease to the Defendant, “HHP No. 7-SY 1” (hereinafter “the instant additional medical care”).
C. On July 2, 2015, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition of the medical care benefits and additional injury and injury and injury and injury and injury in the instant case (hereinafter “non-approval disposition of the medical care benefits in the instant case”) on the ground that the medical care benefits and additional injury and injury and injury and injury and the causal relationship between the first accident and the previous injury and injury were not acknowledged, etc.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Although the additional medical care of this case constitutes “the case where there exists a medical opinion that the additional medical care of this case should be actively treated to cure the aggravated occupational injury or disease, which was the subject of medical care,” under Article 51 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the disposition of non-approval of the medical care benefits of this case rendered by the Defendant is unlawful, and thus, it should be revoked. 2) The additional medical care of this case is necessary due to additional discovery of injury or disease caused by the occupational accident under Article 49 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, or the injury or disease caused by the occupational accident.