logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.24 2012고합1179
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 22, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court. On June 11, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of 4 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On October 12, 201, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the imprisonment of 8 months for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Vocational Training Prison on June 10, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

"2012 Gohap1179"

1. On July 13, 2012, the Defendant was driving a vehicle of approximately 100 meters in volume C high level C, without obtaining a driver’s license on July 13, 2012. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.132% in blood alcohol concentration, from the Seocho Village in Seocho-gu Seoul, to the road located in the same 93-1.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating an automobile which has not been covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated the above cargo vehicle at the time and place as provided in paragraph (1).

"2013 Gohap1350"

1. On August 7, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving license around 10:57, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.176%, and the Defendant was driving the Cwing and Go-III Cargo at the section of about 500 meters from the front of a large-type restaurant in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, with a neighboring house of 703-5 to the said large-type restaurant again returned to a neighboring house.

2. A person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating an automobile which has not been covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated the above cargo vehicle at the time and place as provided in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[2012 Gohap1179]

1. The defendant's oral statement;

arrow