1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,375,750 to Plaintiff A, as well as 5% per annum from February 11, 2015 to July 14, 2016, respectively.

1. Results of adjudication on expropriation and evaluation of compensation;

A. The Central Land Expropriation Committee (1) on December 18, 2014, the Defendant’s Act on National Defense and Military Installations Projects (hereinafter “National Defense and Military Installations Projects Act”) (hereinafter “National Defense and Military Installations Projects Act”).

Pursuant to section C and D(hereinafter referred to as the above C) the building site shall be specified only by the lot number of the site in the case of a building in the above C.

) E projects implemented under this subsection (hereinafter referred to as “instant national defense projects”);

For B, the date of commencement of expropriation shall be set on February 10, 2015 and attached Form in F buildings owned by Plaintiff A, G buildings, and G buildings owned by Plaintiff A

1. Each facility listed in the list and the H building owned by the Plaintiff B was relocated;

(2) At the time of the instant adjudication on expropriation, Plaintiff A operated sales business for about 30 years with the trade name “Isker” in G’s building at the time of the instant adjudication on expropriation (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) (hereinafter “Iser”) and said business was “instant business.”

B. B. As a result of the appraisal of compensation, the Central Land Tribunal set the compensation for the Plaintiffs as indicated in the following table in accordance with the arithmetic mean of the appraisal result of the Pacific Appraisal Corporation and the Pacific Appraisal Board at the time of the instant adjudication on expropriation (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “appraisal”) and the Pacific Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Appraisal Board,” and if some of them are observed, the compensation for the Plaintiffs shall be stated in front of the appraiser.)

(hereinafter “Adjudication Compensation”). The Plaintiff’s adjudication compensation (i) court compensation (ii) Difference (ii) A’s business loss of KRW 94,719,250,250,000, totaling KRW 13,650,000, totaling KRW 14,000,000, KRW 108,369,745,000, KRW 35,660,000, KRW 35,000,000, totaling KRW 35,660,000, KRW 60,000 (-60,000,000) for the relocation of the B building (hereinafter “court appraiser”).

Upon the request of this Court, the Court assessed the Plaintiffs’ compensation as indicated in the following table of court compensation (hereinafter “court appraisal result”) and assessed the amount of compensation as “court compensation.”

(i) 【Disputes based on Recognition.”