1. Of the instant lawsuit, the 12,428,00 won and damages for delay shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

A. From November 2005, the Plaintiff operated the manufacturer of automobile parts with the trade name of “C” at the 1st and second-story factory on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “instant factory”).

(b) Business approval and public notice - Housing site development projects (D) - Public notice: Defendant E, the project operator, who is a defendant, publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 30, 2008.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on February 22, 2013 - Subjects of compensation: Buildings, business facilities, machinery, etc. in the instant factory and the Plaintiff’s business losses - Compensation: KRW 160,380,00: the date of commencement of expropriation: April 17, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation, a central appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”) and a central appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the result of the appraisal of expropriation”) and the result of the said appraisal

D. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on December 19, 2013 - Contents: Increase of compensation to KRW 172,808,00 (the addition of labor cost) - An appraisal corporation: a new appraisal corporation in the future, a new appraisal corporation in the company (hereinafter the above appraisal is referred to as “Objection Ruling”; and the result of the said appraisal (hereinafter “the result of the appraisal”)

E. The court’s commission of appraiser H to the appraiser H, inquiry results (hereinafter “court appraiser”, and combination of the results of the commission of appraisal and fact inquiry results and the results of the fact inquiry is referred to as “court appraisal results”) - The object of appraisal is the cost of transfer of the parts of the obstacles within the factory of this case other than warehouses, factory packaging and boiler rooms (hereinafter “the machinery of this case, etc.”) and the Plaintiff’s business loss - The contents of appraisal are as listed below.

[1] The transfer cost of the instant machinery, etc. (not subject to appraisal) for the removal cost of the instant machinery, etc. for the compensation facility for the adjudication of expropriation of the court’s separate court’s appraisal, as well as the transfer cost (not subject to appraisal) for the remainder of 21,255,000 21,35,358,000 general operating income 31,554,204,625,000 54,700 54,700