logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.17 2017가단229702
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in Appendix 1;

B. Defendant B shall respectively engage in the real estate listed in Appendix 6.

Reasons

In addition to the purport of evidence Nos. 1, 2-5, 3, and 4-1 through 5-4 of the evidence Nos. 4, the purport of the entire pleadings is added, the Plaintiff is the implementer of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant Improvement Project”), the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor authorizing the instant Improvement Project on November 7, 2016 (hereinafter “instant Management and Disposal Plan”), and publicly notifying the instant Management and Disposal Plan on the same day, Defendant A is the occupant of the real estate indicated in attached Form 1, Defendant B is the owner of the real estate listed in attached Form 6, and the Central Land Expropriation Committee determines the amount of compensation for each real estate listed in attached Tables Nos. 1 and 6 as of March 28, 2018, and the Plaintiff paid compensation for each of the instant items to the Defendants (hereinafter “instant Expropriation”) by designating the date of expropriation as of March 28, 2018 (hereinafter “instant expropriation”).

According to the above facts, the plaintiff acquired the right to use and make profits as the project operator of this case and completed the payment of compensation pursuant to the expropriation ruling, so the plaintiff is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in attached Form 1 to the plaintiff, and the defendant Eul is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in attached Form

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

arrow