logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2019.06.12 2018나1549
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts used or added as follows, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Two to fifteen lines of the decision of the first instance court shall be drawn up as follows.

(C) After the Plaintiff supplied the long language as indicated in the above [Attachment] Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff prepared an invoice stating the supply value of KRW 74,904,00 on January 31, 2017 (i.e., KRW 37,656,00 in KRW 37,248,00 in KRW 37,248,00 in KRW) as “D Company B”. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 37,656,00 in KRW 37,656,00 in KRW, and the Plaintiff issued the above invoice to the Defendant on February 6, 2017. The Plaintiff issued the above invoice to the Defendant on February 6, 2017. The Plaintiff written the “No. 5” of 34 lines of the judgment of the first instance court with “No. 5,60 in evidence.”

“(G, H) or 20 lines of the judgment of the first instance court” are added to “(G, H) or “(the fact inquiry inquiry inquiry inquiry by the National Pension Service and the Busan District Court submitted to this court cannot be viewed otherwise).”

The "N" of the fourth three lines of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to "O".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow