logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.10.19 2020누577
조치처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance is in the judgment.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court of first instance is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 3rd of the judgment of the first instance shall be referred to as "the opportunity to state opinions" with "the opportunity to state opinions".

Each "Witness" of the 6th 18th 18th and 7th 3th gate of the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to each "Witness of the first instance court".

In the first instance judgment, the 8th 2-3 lines of the 1st 8th 2nd 3rd 2nd 1st 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd 3rd 2nd

2. In conclusion, the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow