logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.06.15 2020누195
손실보상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the assertion in the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is added or added as follows, and it is insufficient to recognize that the reasonable amount of compensation as to the object of this case exceeds KRW 1,024,447,950 of the compensation of this case deposited by the defendant as evidence submitted additionally by the plaintiff in this court, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground of the judgment, except for the rejection of all of the inquiries and answers to the court of this case, since it is not sufficient to recognize that the reasonable amount of compensation as to the object of this case exceeds KRW 1,024,47,950, as evidence submitted by the plaintiff in this court

Each "this Court" of the following 7 lines, 4 lines, and 3 lines shall be applied to each "court of the first instance" on the third side of the judgment of the first instance.

Then, the Plaintiff asserts that the annual sales of the instant fishing place ought to be calculated on the basis of the number of units actually installed, not the number of units that he obtained permission. However, it is difficult to see that the report of this case, the result of the court’s appraisal, based on the calculation of compensation, is presumed to have been estimated on the basis of the fishing place charges, the number of units, and the status of the use of customers identified at the instant fishing place, and such presumption is reasonable, and thus, the said assertion cannot be accepted.

The "data" of 7.5 lines in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be taken into consideration with "stitive evidence".

The "this judgment" of the 8th judgment of the first instance shall be applied to "the judgment of the first instance".

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal against this is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow