Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

On October 14, 2019, at around 13:33, the Defendant proceeded three lanes in front of the Bupyeong-dong Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, at a speed of about 40 km from the offside of the Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, with three lanes, at a speed of about 40 km from the offside of the Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Since there is a crosswalk in which a signal, etc. is installed, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a right to reduce the speed for the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty on the front side while the traffic signal was changed to a stop signal, and proceeds as it is, and instead, he took the victim C (the age of 81) who was crossing the crosswalk on the front side of the Defendant’s driving car as a front side according to the pedestrian signals.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a closed brupt alone week of medical treatment, due to occupational negligence as above, the victim suffered injury, such as a brupt alone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements prepared in connection with D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) has no history of punishment exceeding a fine in the past, considering that there was no agreement with the victim after the crime of this case, his mistake is against himself, and that vehicles driven by the