The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the statement prepared on February 25, 2018 by the victim of mistake, the fact that the defendant did not contain a statement that the defendant knifedddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddde

In full view of the fact that the defendant asserted, and the injury diagnosis written by the doctor G is only stated in the brain salvine, salvine, and salvine, and is not stated in the “self-salvine,” the judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the trial court and the trial court, the defendant can recognize the fact of the defendant’s selling of the victim’s knife. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit, and the defendant means holding the following body or body near the defendant’s intent to be used at the scene of the crime (see Supreme Court Decision 91Do427, Apr. 9, 191). The special injury crime is established if it was committed against the crime of injury by carrying dangerous articles and actually using dangerous articles (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do914, Mar. 30, 207). Even if the defendant violated the victim’s selling as a knife.

Even if the defendant inflicted an injury by carrying a knife, it does not affect the sex of a special injury.

(1) On March 15, 2018, the victim took the arms of the defendant in the process of police investigation into around March 15, 2018.

진술하였고, 당 심 증인신문과정에서도 피고인이 피해자의 팔을 칼로 그었으며, 병원에 가서 의사에게 팔의 상처를 보여주었는데, 의사가 상처를 보더니 꿰맬...