logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.19 2017고단3406
위증교사
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Majority Relationship] On June 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for special intimidation by the Gwangju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 10, 2017.

[2] On June 17, 2016, the Defendant was indicted by special intimidation of 2016 order 2016 order 2135 order to the Gwangju District Court and was tried by the Defendant. In order to obtain the judgment of innocence in the above trial, the Defendant was asked to make a false testimony to the effect that “A among the persons at the present site, who did not display a knife but did not have a knife C” and “C has a knifeed with a knife.”

1. On January 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked D to the effect that “A knife, and C knife as a knife,” by telephone at a place below Gwangju metropolitan level; and (b) D made a false testimony to the effect that “A knife as a witness” was present at the court No. 102 of the Gwangju District Court around January 13, 2017 as a witness and “A knife at the time, and there was no fact that the Defendant knife and threatened C.”

Accordingly, the defendant caused D to give false testimony and abetted D to give perjury.

2. On January 2 through 2, 2017, the Defendant asked E to the effect that “C makes a statement by his own loss” via phone from a 2 to 3-off place in Gwangju, a false testimony was made to the effect that “E is against C’s own loss,” and that E appeared as a witness at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 14:40 on March 10, 2017, as a witness, at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 102 on the following grounds: (a) there was no fact that the Defendant had indicated C; (b) the Defendant sent a false text message to police officers to the effect that he took a knife; and (c) the Defendant made a false testimony to the effect that “C was in violation of its own knife by cutting the knife.”

As a result, the Defendant instigated E to give false testimony, thereby inducing E to give perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each court of witness E and D.

arrow