logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.11 2016가단225435
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Insurance money of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for a traffic accident indicated in the attached Form.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff is an insurer which entered into a mutual aid agreement for automobile charter buses owned by the said company with B on June 8, 2015. On September 11, 2015, the said company entered into a mutual aid agreement for automobile charter buses with D Livestock Industry Cooperatives with members of the said association, including the Defendant, and entered into a passenger transport agreement with the Korea Stock Exchange on September 11, 2015, which was opened within the 2015 Korean Livestock Industry Association (hereinafter “the instant accident”) with the operator E driving the said chartered bus and returned to Daejeon, around September 15, 2015, when the operator E driving the said chartered bus and returned to Daejeon, around 30, Sep. 15, 2015, the accident occurred that the Defendant walked along the passage that occurred on the road along the seat of the said association (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

3) After that, the Defendant: (a) returned home from the above chartered bus to F; (b) was transferred at no later than 9:0 p.m. on the same day to the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital; and (c) was diagnosed as a blood transfusion from the right f.m. to the right f.m. f.m.; and (d) was diagnosed as a blood transfusion from the two computerized body f.m.m. on the following day; and (b) was subject to two f.m. and the blood f.m. removal on the following day.

B. A party’s assertion that: (a) the Plaintiff’s liability for damages and the Plaintiff’s liability for damages does not fall under the case of personal injury due to the operation of an automobile; (b) that is, the Defendant’s injury does not arise from the operation of the chartered bus; and (c) accordingly, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s injury was caused by the operation of the chartered bus. (b) Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act provides that “A person who operates an automobile for his own sake is liable to compensate for the damage if he killed or injured another person due to the operation of the bus.” (c) Article 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation

arrow