logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.08 2016고합182
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the 20th election of National Assembly members of April 13, 2016, the Defendant was elected by entering the E election district under F political party.

No person shall publish any false information about the place of birth, status, occupation, career, property, personality, act, organization to which he/she belongs, etc. favorable to a candidate, by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communication, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or any other means, with the intention of getting elected or having another person elected.

From August 10, 2004 to July 2, 2006, the Defendant served for one year and 11 months as an assistant to G innovation in the contract position of the assistant to G innovation (class VII equivalent to local public officials).

In G, from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2006, the term H G branch office held office, 4 years from around July 1, 2002 to around June 30, 2006, practitioners of related departments such as the Economic Investment Office and the Investment Promotion Department have made efforts to attract foreign capital inducement of 14 trillion won by attracting business trips to advanced countries where high-tech enterprises, such as the United States, Europe, and Japan, are located and negotiating with business-related persons. As a result, around 203, 2003, the business trip was made directly to advanced countries where high-tech enterprises such as the United States, Europe, and Japan, and led to the investment of 10 trillion won.

In addition, it is confirmed that the 700,000 jobs have been increased in statistics due to the inducement of foreign capital and the increase of population in the Seoul metropolitan area for the four years above.

However, as an innovative decentralization assistant, the Defendant’s business contents are related to university students’ events, such as the dispatch of peace Messen and overseas volunteers, J, K, and G Internet broadcasting, or the promotion of Do affairs, which are directly related to the above G’s business of attracting up-to-date foreign high-tech companies and job creation. However, the facts charged of this case, which were directly related to G’s business of attracting up-to-date foreign high-tech companies and creating jobs, stated that “the facts charged of this case was unrelated to G’s business or job creation.” However, as determined below, the objective meaning of the phrases of this case, and indirect contribution to the Defendant’s

arrow