beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A operated a “D” childcare center in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from May 2017 to February 2019.
Defendant
B has taken over and operated the child care center from March 2019 by Defendant A.
1. On June 16, 2017, Defendant A used a computer installed in the above childcare center and connected to the childcare integration system and provided childcare for a time extension to E in May 2017, Defendant A provided false childcare services to E, as if he provided childcare services for a time extension, Defendant A filed a claim for an extended time extension allowance by preparing a false status of childcare for a time extension and attaching file that can be found to be attached to the above childcare integration system, and received KRW 180,000 for an extended time payment from Songpa-gu around June 23, 2017.
In addition, from June 16, 2017 to March 20, 2019, the Defendant received total of KRW 22,328,320 from Songpa-gu as the above FFF bank account by filing a claim for overtime allowances, holiday infant care allowances, and holiday infant care personnel expenses by means of preparing a false report on the current status of extended hours of infant care from around June 16, 2017 to around March 16, 2019, the daily status of infant care, records of extended hours by children, records of use of extended hours by children, certificates of records of extended hours of infant care, certificates of records of extended hours of infant care, and files that can be stored.
As a result, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 22,328,320 from Songpa-gu and received KRW 22,328,320 from the victim.
2. On April 18, 2019, Defendant B, who used a computer installed in the above childcare center, connected to the childcare integration system and provided childcare leave to G in March 2019, even though the said childcare center did not provide childcare leave to G in March 2019, Defendant B, as if he provided childcare leave to G, falsely prepared a written confirmation of the record of holiday and childcare, and attached a file to the said childcare integration system, filed a claim for holiday and childcare leave allowance from Songpa-gu.