The sentence against the accused shall be KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:40 on May 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed theft by taking one gallonp (0.10) equivalent to one million won at the market price set on the front of the cash withdrawal period in the process of withdrawing cash from the victim C at a new bank, located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Pilotage 286, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, by taking one gallonp (10.1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. D's legal statement;

1. The application of C’s written statements and investigation reports (to hear statements from victims’ telephone calls) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The respondent has cited the tables to return to the State and does not intend to do so. The following day, which did not take measures such as giving the Bank due to the circumstances such as taking a leave of absence and taking a distance from the Bank. For this reason, even if he knows well that CCTV was installed in the vicinity of the cash withdrawal period, he withdrawn cash at the cash withdrawal period, and even when he was given a call from the first bank, he was in custody of the bellp immediately and immediately.

There is no reason for the defendant who has no difficulty in living as a public official in terms of his status as a public official to bring blordc to an illegal acquisition will.

In addition, it is not possible to establish larceny because it is already an object that has already escaped from another's possession.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant did not take a measure to inform the bank or police about about 40 hours from the time of bringing to the Bluc to the time of receiving a telephone from the bank and did not want to find the Bluc. Even though he knew that he had a telephone function in the Bluc, he was released from all immediately after he acquired the Bluc. The defendant was on the next leave.