1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Basic Facts

In this part, the reasons for this Court shall be the fourth M of the judgment of the first instance.

In addition to the following, the entry is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In collusion with Defendant A, a fine for criminal facts of the party A for the sale of the instant 2 products, which are medical appliances not permitted to be manufactured by item; ② sale of the instant 1 products, which are medical appliances without reporting sales business; ③ sale of the Plaintiff’s medical appliances manufacturing business; ③ sale of the instant 1 and 2 products, which are medical appliances marked by misappropriation No. 562; and SS-103, which are medical appliances; ② Violation of the Medical Devices Act; ② Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, KRW 5 million, Defendant C sales business report.

The act of resistance shall be done without reporting the sale business of Defendant D, which violates the Medical Devices Act, one million won.

The act of resistance 1.5 million won in violation of the Medical Devices Act shall be reported to Defendant E-sale business.

The act of resistance 1.5 million won Defendant F sales business without reporting the violation of the Medical Devices Act.

The act of resistance 1.5 million won Defendant G sales business without reporting the violation of the Medical Devices Act.

The act of resistance 1 million won in violation of the Medical Devices Act is done without reporting the sale business of Defendant H.

Aviation Act 1 million won in violation of the Medical Devices Act

E. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, and F were issued with the Seoul Northern District Court No. 2013568, Oct. 8, 2012; Defendant G was issued with the Seoul Southern District Court No. 2012 high-level 19627, Jan. 10, 2013; Defendant H was issued with each of the following summary orders as Seoul Southern Southern District Court No. 2013 high-level 37, Feb. 7, 2013.

Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter “Unfair Competition Prevention Act”) to sell products of this case 1 and 2, which are medical devices for which the above Defendants used stolen the Plaintiff’s manufacturing business permission number, manufacturing item report number and trade name to be indicated against Defendant A and B.

(b) another person's name, trade name, trademark, or product widely known in the Republic of Korea;