Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At the time of the prosecution in 2013, the Defendant lent KRW 30 million to C through E-dong B, and received C’s D D D-Ws as security. On October 17, 2014, the Defendant obtained a notarized certificate stating that the Defendant would acquire B’s claim against C and additionally lend KRW 15 million to C by February 10, 2015, and paid KRW 50 million to C by February 27, 2015. On the 27th day of the same month, the Defendant had registered the transfer of ownership to the said vehicle under C’s name, and had C continue to operate the said vehicle.

1. The Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means asked C to make a false statement that C would recover the vehicle or receive insurance money from vehicle theft by reporting the theft of DWts’ automobiles that C would not pay money on the agreed date, and that C would drive the said vehicle at the time of theft and parked in the stolen place.

On February 24, 2015, around 17:05, the Defendant was stolen on February 23, 2015, when parking benz car in front of the Daegu Southern-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, and on February 23, 2015.

‘ ‘ falsely reported’ was made to the effect that it was stolen.

and the same year

4. Around 19.1, at the investigation of the Daegu Southern-gu Police Station and the criminal department office, the police officer G, who was in charge, made a false statement to the police officer G, who was the police officer in charge, stated that he was finally operated.

B On May 14, 2015, at the investigation of the Daegu Southern Police Station and the criminal department office, the police officer, stated that “The police officer, at the Defendant’s request, was parked in the stolen location by operating the stolen sports car.”

However, in fact, the above vehicle was continuously operated by C, and there was no theft.

The Defendant, in collusion with B, filed a false report, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the collection and investigation of stolen vehicles by deceptive means.

2. The Defendant is guilty.