logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고정2092
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 2003, the Defendant provided a name-free person with B low-priced vehicle owned by the Defendant as collateral and borrowed cash of KRW 3 million, and then delivered a notice of a fine for negligence such as violation of parking regulations with a vehicle exceeding 100 recommendations to the other person while the vehicle was not fully repaid with the money, and had the intention to file a false report on vehicle theft in order to find the vehicle.

around 1:15 on April 17, 2010, the Defendant: (a) was stolen at the police box of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the police station of the defendant, who was parked in the street near the Daegu Suwon High School near the police station of the police station of the 19:00 to 10:0 on April 15, 2010.

The report shall be made and a statement shall be prepared and submitted.

However, in fact, the Defendant reported the theft of the vehicle, even though there was no theft of the vehicle from exceeding other persons because the Defendant provided the above vehicle as collateral and used the money to lend it to other persons.

As a result, the Defendant had police slope D, who is unaware of the circumstances, prepare a report on the early measures against the theft incident, etc., and had the Defendant enter the aforementioned vehicle into the electronic data processing system of the police officers into false facts that the Defendant was stolen, so that the Defendant could double the number of stolen vehicles across the country, and had the operator of the said vehicle free of charge for the purpose of criminal punishment by searching the vehicles on hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A report on initial measures against thief incidents;

1. Detailed data on printed materials on stolen vehicles, and on stolen vehicles;

1. Automobile register;

1. Statement and the application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes thereof;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow