logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.03.06 2014고단521
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around October 27, 2011, the Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the Defendant at the Daegu Bank merchant in the 1511 Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 1511 and traded household checks.

On October 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant, which was the “D”, “three million won”, “three million won”, and “the date of issuance,” in the Defendant’s management C in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, and the date of the issuance of the check.

On December 13, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check to the above bank on December 13, 2013.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

Accordingly, the Defendant issued a provisional coefficient list of KRW 30,00,000 in total from around 10 to November 201, 2013, including that the Defendant did not receive on the date of presentation as a disposition of suspension of transaction after issuing the check, and did not receive it on the date of presentation as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

On October 27, 2011, the Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the Defendant at the Daegu Bank merchant store located in 1511, Seogu, Daegu, Daegu, and has traded household checks.

On October 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant, “E”, “E”, “three million won”, and “one copy of the bank household check issued on December 11, 2013” in the name of the Defendant’s management C in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu.

On December 13, 2013, the holder of the check presented the check to the above bank on the date of presentment for payment.

However, the defendant did not pay for the shortage of deposit.

Accordingly, the defendant did not receive the deposit payment date after issuing the deposit slip.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 521"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. "A copy of each defaulted check";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation; 1.

arrow