logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.04 2014고정3387
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2014, the Korean Democratic Labor Union Federation (hereinafter “Korean Labor Union Federation”), the Korean Agriculture Association Federation, the Korean Women’s Federation, the Korean Women’s Association, the Korean Women’s Association, etc. (hereinafter “National Labor Union Committee”) planned the national general strike on February 25, 2014, which is the year when D President was appointed, and from 16:00 to 16:00 on the same day, the Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee decided to hold a “D regime one year and that it will be impossible to do so.” (hereinafter “National Labor Union Resolution”) and to hold a candlelight assembly from 19:00 on the day.

Accordingly, on February 25, 2014, around 16:25, 13,00 (10,000 civil union members/civil union members 1,500/civil union members / 1,000 / 400 of party members/ Other 100) were held at the Seoul plaza located in Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and the meeting was completed at around 17:40 after the assembly was held in the order of the practice of the war of the speech of cultural performance or symbol of the visual company as a public-private society E, while holding the national strike.

On the other hand, at around 18:03 on the same day, about 2,00 participants in the assembly after the end of the assembly as above, they exceeded the course of driving at around 18:03 on the same day and occupied the front roadway of the building of the National Human Rights Commission of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-ro 16.

Around 18:03 of the same day, the Defendant’s demonstrationd for about 50 minutes after escaping from the delivery, which is the parallel section reported, for about 18:03 on the same day, while occupying the lanes in the south of the broadband.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with 2,00 participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic of the land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1.25 2.25 25 2.25 2.25 20 2.20

1.25 Status of the National Derivatives Competition Act;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documentary evidence;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow