A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 29, 2014, at around 20:00, the Defendant damaged the repair cost of KRW 437,776, including exchange of the preceding pandecers, on the front of “D” located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by blocking the operation of the FF taxi operated by the victim E by blocking its bicycle route, and the victim demanded that “the path turn on her bicycle,” and the victim “I am on the way in this length, but the individual taxi has ever been left. I am in the Dong-gu market.” On two occasions, the Defendant damaged that the repair cost of KRW 437,776, such as exchange of the preceding pandecers, by means of a reduction or a decrease of the bicycle.”

2. On July 29, 2014, at around 20:25, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) 112 reported that there was a person who frighting a vehicle in front of the H District District of the Daegu East Police Station, Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu District; and (b) 112 reported that he was sent to the site, and voluntarily carried out her work with I and the circumstances belonging to the said earth; and (c) the Defendant deemed the Defendant to have been in front of the earth, and (d) the Defendant her fright at the toilet to have the urine seen the urine at the toilet, and said I expressed his desire to her fright at the toilet, and she was faced with the wall of the said I, and she frighted the slope of the J’s slope belonging to the said earth.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by the police officer I and the Assistant J.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to I, J, and E;

1. Each photograph;

1. Place of service;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Article 136 (1) and Article 366 of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of recommending punishment] shall be type 1 of the obstruction of performance of official duties.