logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고단4675
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2014, at around 00:58, the Defendant: (a) breathed the victim B (the age of 19) who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the daily elementary school located in the middle of Daegu Suwon-gu, and went through without any justifiable reason; (b) fladd the head debt with the hand hand; (c) flad the back of the brea face with the hand floor; and (d) flad the victim’s breath face with approximately two weeks, the Defendant dump, the part, and the part of the bladles that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the above date, time, and place 112 reported and sent out to the Suwon Police Station C District D’s slope, etc., and caused assault to the Defendant, and damaged the Defendant’s vehicle with the rear door of the Embling Embling that attempted to board the patrol vehicle, and damaged the said patrol vehicle, which is a public object, by spreading both the rear door and the lower part of the patrol vehicle on a hand, so that the amount of 235,541 won for repairing the said patrol vehicle, which is a public object, can be damaged.

3. At around 01:25 on the same day, the Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties, following the arrest of a flagrant offender and moving to the Daegu Suwon-gu Police Station C district located in Daegu Suwon-gu F, and obstructed the patrol car, and the police officer belonging to the said police group, who was in charge of the said police group, fluencing his hand, etc., and assaulted him by walking his hand, and continuously flucing police officers working within the said police group, and 50 minutes of the disturbance.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D and B;

1. Reporting on the arrest of suspects in the line of duty, such as obstruction of performance of official duties, on-site evacuation reports and duty sites;

1. Each photograph;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 136 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow