logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.15 2016구합69710
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff was established on February 14, 1997, and changed to the current trade name by accepting C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) as a company established on March 17, 2015. Around 1,200 full-time workers engaged in the manufacturing business of special lectures used in the mouth and steel products.

An intervenor joined C on March 16, 1997 and served as the audit team leader from March 29, 199, and as an accuracy management group leader from April 1, 201, and from January 1, 201, as an executive officer officer of the management support division from October 4, 201, as an administrative support group from the administrative support group from October 4, 201, as an accuracy management office assistant from July 1, 201 to an accuracy management office (office) and from January 1, 2014 to an accuracy management office (office). On March 17, 2015, the intervenor was issued to the Plaintiff Company as a part of the reorganization of the organization, and was assigned to the personnel management team on the same day.

On October 2, 2015, the Plaintiff held a personnel management committee to decide on disciplinary dismissal against the Intervenor as follows (hereinafter “instant disciplinary dismissal”), and notified the Intervenor that he was dismissed on the 5th of the same month on the 6th of the same month.

(2) On September 16, 2015, Article 50(2) Subparag. 8 of the Rules of Employment (hereinafter “instant dismissal”) provides false information to the Group Obspers of deceptive order and provides false information to the group Obpers of deceptive order by spreading false information on 1.1. False information on the details of the Disciplinary Reason (hereinafter “instant dismissal”). Article 50(2)1, Article 50(2)13, Article 50(2)13, of the Rules of Employment (hereinafter “Rules of Employment”) of the Act provides that a company’s non-bank and defamation against D directors on March 18, 2015, thereby disturbing organizational order.

arrow