1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

. notified that it is scheduled;

2) On October 28, 2016, the Defendant Personnel Committee shall be subject to the grounds for disciplinary action as follows (hereinafter “the grounds for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff”).

Based on such reasoning, pursuant to Article 52 Subparag. 15, 20, 28, Article 53 Subparag. 9, and 20 of the Defendant’s Rules of Employment, the Defendant decided to take disciplinary measures against the Plaintiff on December 1, 2016, and notified the Plaintiff on December 1, 2016. At the time, H, I, and J were present at the meeting. - After carrying out a threatening driving against a bus bus operated by FF employees, a customer company, on December 22, 15, the Plaintiff was present at the meeting of H, I, and J. (hereinafter “paragraph (1)”).

- The above person reported to the police the instant transit bus article by extracting only a part of the images of his vehicle booms, but the police in the course of the investigation rather verified the above person’s misconduct during the investigation (hereinafter “paragraph 2”).

- Criminal punishment (determination of sentence) against the assistance in astronomical support in relation to these misconducts on August 5, 16) - Special intimidation: 3 years of suspended sentence of one year and six months of imprisonment, 120 hours of community service, 40 hours of compliance driving education (hereinafter “paragraph 3”).

- - A serious threat to the safety of customer officers (and companies) on board with a threat of a social issue (hereinafter referred to as “paragraph 4”).

- Undermining the reputation/credit of the company and causing damage to the trust relationship between the customer company and the company (hereinafter referred to as “paragraph 5”).

(3) The Plaintiff filed an application for reexamination on the Defendant’s disciplinary dismissal as of December 1, 2016. Accordingly, the Review Personnel Committee was held on December 23, 2016, but the Defendant’s Review Personnel Committee also passed a resolution on the disciplinary dismissal as of January 4, 2017 against the Plaintiff on the ground of the same disciplinary cause and ground on December 23, 2016 (hereinafter “instant dismissal”) and notified the Plaintiff on January 4, 2017.

At the time of review, H, I, and J were present as a member of the Committee.

E. The defendant related to the dismissal of the instant case.