beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 13, 2011, the Defendant subscribed to three units in the “Dcafeteria” located in the Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central District Office C, and paid 400,000 won per month to the victim E in the “13-day limit from among the numbers organized within the city”, and would pay an amount of money to the specified order.
The phrase “the phrase was false.”
However, in fact, the defendant had been able to organize and operate a system since 20 years ago, and the deficit occurred due to abnormal operation, and around the second half of 2011, approximately KRW 1.7 billion was incurred, and even if the defendant newly organized a system and received the deposit from the fraternity members, he had the intention to return the deposit, to prevent the repayment of the bond interest, to repay the bond interest, and to use the real estate in the name of the defendant and family members for the purpose of purchasing the real estate in the name of the plaintiff and family members, so there was no intention or ability
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim E, received KRW 22,80,000 from the victim E to April 13, 2013, from the victim E, KRW 113,00,000,000,000 from the victim, as shown in the attached list of crimes, as well as receiving KRW 22,80,00 from the victim E.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;
1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;
1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes are recognized by the defendant, there is no history of punishment in the past, and the circumstances where the defendant was taken into account by means of emulative diseases, depression, etc., may be taken into account. However, even though the amount of damage (total KRW 113 million) corresponding to the multiple people did not have any effort for recovery of damage, it is necessary to determine that there was no effort for recovery of damage. Thus, the sentence such as the order should be imposed.