A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had been operating approximately 150 books from around 2006 to around 150, but the members of the fraternity did not pay the fraternity and had no intent or ability to pay the fraternity to the members of the fraternity, even though the amount that was paid by the previous members of the fraternity had been continuously organized to cover the amount that was not paid by the previous members of the fraternity, and the amount that was paid by the newly organized fraternity was paid by the previous members of the fraternity, such as the payment of the fraternity to the members of the previous fraternity, even though he did not actually have an intention or ability to pay the fraternity to the members of the fraternity.

A. On September 13, 2010, in the five-story Ctel of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim D falsely speaks that “If a person enters the five-story to pay KRW 2,500,000 per month, he/she will pay KRW 30,000,000 per month, at a six-time,” and the victim believed that it is true that it will pay KRW 20,000,000 per month until eight times;

B. In the same place as of July 7, 2011, at the same time as in paragraph 1 of this Article, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “if the victim has subscribed to three previous accounts each month, he/she will take up two times, eight times, and five million won each time at a time, each time, respectively.” In fact, the victim has the victim pay KRW 15,500,000 as the deposit amount of the eight and twelve times, respectively.

C. On July 12, 2011, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “If three units are paid in 500,000 won each week, 3, 12, and 19 times, 3, 12, and 19 times,” and that the victim believed this fact would pay KRW 7,000,000 to 19 times.

D. In the same place as in July 27, 2011, at the same time as in paragraph (1) of this Article, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “if two or more accounts are paid in 500,000 won per demand day, 10,000 won per each of 18,000 won shall be paid in 18,000 won per demand,” and that the victim, who is believed to be in fact, paid 7,00,000 won per 18,000

E. At the same place as on September 20, 201, at the same time as paragraph 1, paragraph 3 and 50 million each time, where “five million won each is paid to the victim.”