logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.08.13 2013고단649
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 17, 2010, the Defendant’s fraternity fraud (related to the 17th century) of the Defendant stated that “Around October 17, 2010, the Defendant was operating a fraternity (17 days in the name of one) in the Defendant’s dwelling area of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C apartment 303, and that “When he joined the fraternity and pays 500,000 won in 21 times per month, he would pay the fraternity on the desired date regardless of the order of priority.”

However, from 2010 to 2010, the defendant was unemployed by her husband, and even if the defendant organized the above system, such as failure to make an individual investment and excessive personal debt, he did not have the intention or ability to normally operate it, and all the guidances received from her members were used as the defendant's personal debt repayment, living expenses, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was issued KRW 30 million from October 17, 2010 to May 201, 201, to five victims, including the fact that the Defendant, from around October 17, 2010 to by deceiving the victim, was issued KRW 30 million in all over 20 times from around May 201, and received KRW 100 million from around October 201 to around May 201.

2. Around September 5, 2011, the Defendant’s fraternity fraud (related to five days in the name of the five) stated that “In the course of operating the fraternity (five days in the name of one) at the Defendant’s residence of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 303, the Defendant would impose an advance on the victim D on the desired date regardless of the sequence if he/she opens the fraternity and pays 21,000 won per 50,000 won per month.”

However, from 2010 to 2010, the Defendant was unemployed by her husband, and even if the Defendant organized the above system and received the fraternity from the members, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the fraternity by operating it normally.

arrow