logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.07.07 2017고단1160
국민체육진흥법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall gambling using a prohibited act of offering property or property benefits to persons who win the result of sports promotion by issuing voting rights or a similar things to the Korea Sports Promotion Foundation or a person who is not an entrusted business entity.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around May 4, 2012, connected the Defendant’s house located in Seocheon-si B building 203 to the “C” site of the illegal private sports soil site, deposited 2.4 million won in the account of the national bank (Account Number E) in the name of D used by the operator for the gambling money deposit account, deposited the points that can be used in the above site, and predicted the outcome of the sports competition designated on the above site by using it, received profits from the distribution rate of the hosting amount, and lost the molding amount, from around 0 to December 14, 2012 to around 00, 1300 won, from around 00 to 200, 2018, 2000 won, 300 won, 1.5 billion won, 2.5 billion won, 2.5 billion won, 2.5 billion won, 3 billion won, from around 20, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Investigation report (report on tracing the funds of earth-use accounts);

1. Investigative report (A and other relevant suspects);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (Attachment of details of transactions of bank accounts under the name of suspect A);

1. Article 48 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 3 of Article 48 of the National Sports Promotion Act, and Article 26 (1) of the same Act, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the confession of the defendant, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

arrow