logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고단1503
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment by obstructing business operations at the Seoul Western District Court, and completed the execution of the above sentence at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 2, 2018.

"2018 Highest 1503"

1. On May 3, 2018, around 12:30 on May 3, 2018, the Defendant ordered alcohol and alcohol to the victim D operation in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the victim even if the victim made drinking and the safe drinking.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the same amount of monetary benefits as he was provided with alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to the total market value of 25,000 won from the injured party.

2. On May 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 13:10 on May 3, 2018, on the ground that the injured party demanded payment of the price, the Defendant: (b) laid three small-scale suppliers on the floor of the table, laid off three small-scale suppliers on the floor of the table; (c) continued to collect water branches on the table, and prevented other customers from entering the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

3. On May 3, 2018, the Defendant damaged the market value of plastic liners by gathering them and destroying them, such as paragraph (2) of the said Article, at around 13:10.

around 00:50 on May 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 00:50 on May 3, 2018, demanded that the Defendant take a taxi operated by the victim G from Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu to go as if he were to pay taxi expenses.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi use fee even if the victim arrives at the dispatch police station after operating the taxi.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and let the victim take the defendant in the taxi and let the defendant take the police station in the dispatching station.

arrow